Skip to main content

Paul Guiragossian (1926 – 1993) is easily one of Lebanon’s most celebrated modern artists, famous for his colourful and figurative paintings, which sometimes border on the edge of abstraction. Born in Jerusalem, his family moved to Lebanon in 1947, where he spent the majority of his career, becoming one of the most loved artists of the Arab world.

Earlier this year, his much-anticipated monograph Paul Guiragossian: Displaced Modernity – edited by the curatorial duo Sam Bardaouil and Till Fellrath, together with Paul Guiragossian’s daughter and president of the Paul Guiragossian Foundation, Manuella Guiragossian – was launched at Art Dubai. The book was recently transformed into an exhibition at Beirut Art Fair called Lebanon Modern! A Tribute to Paul Guiragossian, which consisted of a chronological display of the artist’s work that not only included paintings and drawings, but also family photographs, film clips and quotes. Armenia Art Fair spoke with Manuella Guiragossian about her father’s artwork and the exhibition in Beirut.

Armenia Art Fair: How did the exhibition at Beirut Art Fair come about?

Manuella Guiragossian: This year, and more specifically November 20, 1993, marks the 25th anniversary of Paul Guiragossian’s passing so over a year ago the Paul Guiragossian Foundation planned for a few commemorative events surrounding this anniversary as well as the release of the much anticipated monograph, Paul Guiragossian: Displacing Modernity published by Silvana Editoriale and edited by Sam Bardaouil, Till Fellrath and myself.

The book was launched at Art Dubai in March 2018 in parallel with an exhibition at the Barjeel Art Foundation in Sharjah with works coming from collections only in the UAE.

The Tribute exhibition at the Beirut Art Fair took place in September as the monograph was also released worldwide and was set to take the audience on a little walk through the 5 decades of Guiragossian’s career.

AAF: What was the reception like to the exhibition?

MA: Anything we do around Paul Guiragossian always gets great reception and fascination by all generations. We usually get major attendance and very often re-attendance by people who want to learn more and can’t get enough. I feel that people have a thirst to learn more about Guiragossian and working on this book for over 5 years gives me great satisfaction in sharing a lot about the artist’s life and work with the public.

We get art collectors, art enthusiasts, students and press as well as people who are newly discovering the artist. Audiences are always thankful and appreciative of the efforts we make as a foundation and that gives us the drive to continue.

AAF: How did you go about curating the exhibition, why did you select the images that you did, the film clips, the photographs?

MA: As I had worked on the archives for more than 10 years, I have a very particular understanding of my father’s path and artistic evolution, so I wanted to present that (as we did in the monograph) through the archival material as well as the original works. I wanted to create that path through the decades of his life and have the audience walk through the book and discover the different stages of Paul’s life.

Image from the Paul Guiragossian “A Tribute” Retrospective 02. © Courtesy Paul Guiragossian Foundation. Photo Credit: Beirut Art Fair 2018

AAF: What is your favourite work in the exhibition?  

MA: It’s very difficult to pick one work as my favourite because I have many. Every decade has masterpieces that are stunning and have such depth, especially since I know the stories behind them, it makes it hard to choose. Having said that, I have a special place in my heart for “Composition” (also titled “La Grande Charge”, 1990-91. Oil on canvas. 130 x 200 cm.) which is magnificent in my opinion because it encapsulates my father’s entire career. To reach that kind of virtuosity after about 50 years is just amazing. It’s also why I used a detail from it on the cover of the monograph.

Beacon Over the City (1977) – Oil on canvas – 118 x 89 cm. Ramzi and Saeda Dalloul Art Foundation, Lebanon

AAF: The book that the Beirut Art Fair exhibition was based on (Paul Guiragossian: Displacing Modernity) launched at Art Dubai in March of this year, what did it mean to have this exhibition in Beirut?

MA: Beirut is the city that embraced my father, gave him a permanent home, a family and success. The Lebanese people adore Paul Guiragossian and are always very excited and proud to see his work, that’s why it’s very important for us to release this book in Beirut and to do exhibitions around Guiragossian as often as possible.

Silence (circa 1968) – Oil on canvas – 165 x 120 cm. Paul Guiragossian Estate collection, Lebanon

AAF: With the inclusion of quotes and film clips, it seemed like you tried to let people know about Paul Guiragossian’s personality, adding layers to Paul Guiragossian the painter, with the father, husband, teacher. What is it most important to you for people to know about him? 

MA: I think people need to know the combination of things Paul was in order to have a better understanding of his work and his philosophy. It’s through monographs such as the one just published with 400 pages, 600 artworks and archival documents and comprehensive anthology of primary documents that we can tap into the world of Guiragossian a little bit. People are usually familiar with one aspect of his work while there is a fascinating amount of ideas, history, conferences and a very unique look at life that they need to know as well. Only then will people be able to have a clear idea of who Paul was and then the artwork will mean so much more.

Image from the Paul Guiragossian “A Tribute” Retrospective 03. © Courtesy Paul Guiragossian Foundation. Photo Credit: Beirut Art Fair 2018

AAF: Will the exhibition tour? What do you hope people will take away from the exhibition?

MA: Paul Guiragossian represents multiple people not just Armenians, Palestinians, Lebanese but a vast region, which is mostly misunderstood, misrepresented or marginalized. A touring exhibition sheds light on all these things to a larger public and other cultures who never come to our region to be able to learn and experience our arts and artists. Our culture. A comprehensive monograph about Paul Guiragossian that is distributed worldwide for the first time, is a good start and we hope these exhibitions will get a chance to reach more countries and museums for us to be able to share all this with.

Leave a Reply

The presentation explores contemporary approaches to the digital documentation and accessibility of Armenian cultural heritage through the work of the Armenian Cultural Heritage Institute. It will address how heritage preservation, digital technologies, and 3D scanning initiatives can support contemporary artistic creation, research, and new forms of cultural engagement, including projects such as the Armenian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale 2025.

DDD Kunst House is an independent virtual and physical shared space that aims to provide a platform for local and international artists and curators to connect and communicate in a pure and free environment. The concept was founded in 2020 by curator Tereza Davtyan during the lockdown in Yerevan, as a response to the need for an online space where artists and curators could work together outside the limitations of traditional art institutions, foundations, museums, and galleries. :DDD Kunst House initiates from messenger chats to studio visits while sharing an open space for proper communication and collaboration. It selects the most relevant projects and may showcase them spontaneously, without focusing on a specific target audience, as it is sure that the audience will, one way or another, find their way to :DDD Kunst House. Founded in 2020 during the global COVID-19 pandemic, :DDD Kunst House is an independent, curator-led platform dedicated to fostering artistic exchange, care, and experimentation across borders. Initially operating entirely online, the initiative built a strong and diverse community through digital exhibitions, public talks, and collaborative projects. In 2022, the platform transitioned into a physical location within the former Scientific Research Institute of Spa Treatment and Physical Medicine in Yerevan, a unique and unconventional space that continues to serve as a site for exhibitions, residencies, performances, workshops, and informal public gatherings. At the core of its programming is the Sleepover Artist Residency, a distinctive, process-oriented residency model that offers artists time and space to rest, reflect, and create without the pressure of fixed outcomes. Since its launch (2024–2025), the residency has welcomed over 20 international artists from countries including Germany, France, Taiwan, Switzerland, Croatia, the United States, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Georgia, Argentina/Chile, Italy, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. This ongoing international engagement has significantly enriched the local cultural context and fostered meaningful, long-term connections between artists, curators, and researchers. :DDD Kunst House continues to operate as a flexible and responsive platform that supports contemporary artistic practices while maintaining a strong commitment to inclusivity, hospitality, and critical dialogue. website: www.dddkunsthouse.com IG: @ddd_kunsthouse

This presentation introduces the mission and current activities of the Ervand Kochar Museum, situating its work within the broader context of preserving and promoting modern Armenian art. It reflects on the legacy of Ervand Kochar, highlighting key aspects of his artistic contribution, while also outlining the museum’s recent achievements and its ongoing efforts to reposition Kochar within an international art historical framework.

This presentation examines the question of national identity among artists of the Tbilisi school of painting of both Georgian and Armenian origin. It focuses on professional artists Mose Toidze and Grigol Sharbabchyan, as well as self-taught painters Niko Pirosmani and Karapet Grigoryants.

A comparative analysis of their works reveals, on the one hand, shared themes and motifs, and on the other, differences in aesthetic and artistic perception. These differences, among artists living within the same geographical and social environment, demonstrate the resilience of long-standing national traditions in both cultures.

Abstract: Charles Sirató’s Dimensionist Manifesto (1936) created a network linking the international avant-garde, including Ervand Kotchar and António Pedro. Grounded in the theory of relativity and an interpretation of the fourth dimension, it extended this idea across literature, painting, sculpture, and their transgressions. These arts were expanded upon by adding a new dimension to the traditional ones. While Kotchar’s “painting in space” and Pedro’s dimensional poems viewed dimensional increase based on concepts of simultaneity and duration, Sirató emphasized a scientifically informed, material objectification as the basis for new perception. Together, these perspectives define a key transformation of the art object in the avant-garde in the 1930s.


Leon (Serge) Tutundjian: A Moment in Time: The Paris avant garde in transition amid a multiplicity of theories and practices.

Between 1925 and 1930, Paris functioned as a cauldron of ideas and experimental practices across film, poetry, sculpture, painting, and philosophy. At the centre of these developments were urgent questions of space and metaphysics-above all, the relationship between objects and the role of the viewer in the realisation of a work of art.

Within this field, Leon (Serge) Tutundjian emerges as a key figure. His work destabilises form, collapsing the boundary between object and perception and requiring the viewer’s active participation. In doing so, he anticipates the logic of Tachism-not as a style, but as a mode of thought in which the artwork is realised through perception.

Alongside Kochar and Kakabadze, Tutundjian exhibited with the Parisian avant- garde, contributing to a shift from form to experience. The Wall Street Crash of 1929 curtailed this moment of experimentation, forcing artists and markets into retreat. Tutundjian left Parris soon after, his trajectory abruptly interrupted.

This brief period-following the cultural intensity of Weimar Berlin-proved decisive in shaping modernism. Though now largely forgotten, Tutundjian was not peripheral, but integral to this redefinition of the artwork as a site of unstable meaning and viewer realisation.

This presentation explores how the unique institutional model of the ZKM | Center for Art and Media, Karlsruhe supports media art across its entire lifecycle: From ideation and production through exhibition to preservation and restoration. Central to this approach is empowering artists through the support infrastructure and expertise of its people, integrating cutting-edge tools into an ecosystem that bridges artistic production, maintenance, and long-term conservation of
media art works.

What happens when a museum cannot honestly say what a work is, who made it, or whether what you are seeing matches what was first shown? This talk argues that digital instability is not a technical problem awaiting a solution — it is the underlying condition of cultural work today. Moving through three interlocking registers — technical, cognitive, and authorial — it proposes framing as care as a curatorial practice adequate to the present: one that renders uncertainty legible rather than resolving it, and that holds institutions accountable for the systems they host, commission, and call art.

This presentation explores how and why the ArtNexus project integrates international expertise with local governance to foster a resilient and democratic cultural sector in Armenia. By examining our multi-stakeholder approach to policy development and institutional support, we highlight how collaborative program models can bridge the gap between global standards and local artistic needs while maintaining respect for cultural differences.

This theme looks at cross-border initiatives, artist collectives, and collaborative projects that connect Georgian and Armenian artists and cultural practitioners. In reaction to common histories of empire, conflict, migration, and underfunded cultural infrastructures, it emphasises the practical, ethical, and political aspects of cooperation. It explores how such partnerships negotiate national narratives and conflict legacies while addressing networked practices, such as co-productions, artist-run spaces, residencies, exhibitions and digital platforms.